<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.1-alpha-2539" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
		>
	<channel>
		<title>WordPress.com Forums &#187; Topic: Group &quot;Google&quot; Referrers</title>
		<link>http://en.forums.wordpress.com/topic/group-google-referrers</link>
		<description>WordPress.com Forums &#187; Topic: Group &quot;Google&quot; Referrers</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1-alpha-2539</generator>
				<atom:link href="http://en.forums.wordpress.com/rss/topic/group-google-referrers" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>raincoaster on "Group &quot;Google&quot; Referrers"</title>
			<link>http://en.forums.wordpress.com/topic/group-google-referrers#post-1139520</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 04:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>raincoaster</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">1139520@http://en.forums.wordpress.com/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Twitter isn't broken down like that, so it can't be split up or combined that way.
</p>
]]></description>
					</item>
		<item>
			<title>jhwygirl on "Group &quot;Google&quot; Referrers"</title>
			<link>http://en.forums.wordpress.com/topic/group-google-referrers#post-1139506</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 03:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>jhwygirl</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">1139506@http://en.forums.wordpress.com/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It would be awesome if they could do that for twitter, too.  I'd like to know who's linking us.
</p>
]]></description>
					</item>
		<item>
			<title>jongleason on "Group &quot;Google&quot; Referrers"</title>
			<link>http://en.forums.wordpress.com/topic/group-google-referrers#post-1139270</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>jongleason</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">1139270@http://en.forums.wordpress.com/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I asked about all the different "Googles" showing up under referrers in a <a href="http://en.forums.wordpress.com/topic/referrers-google-search-engines?replies=6#post-1132740">support question</a>, and I understand what is going on now.  It is logged-in hits from Google+ or some other Google service where Google isn't passing any information.</p>
<p>But it is still annoying, because my referrers list gets filled up with Google India and Google Philippines and Google Mexico and Google Canada, etc, etc, etc.  I recognize that these may not be search engine hits, so I understand why you aren't listing them under search engines.  Makes sense.</p>
<p>So, my idea was that you could group the "Googles" just like you do "Search Engines."  Search engines are just one line on the referrers list, but expandable if I want to see which search engines.  You could do the same with Googles -- a single line ("Google") but expandable, and then it would show all the different national Googles.  It would make the referrers list a lot cleaner.
</p>
]]></description>
					</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
