<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.1-alpha-2539" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
		>
	<channel>
		<title>WordPress.com Forums &#187; Topic: Word tags - a request for explanation</title>
		<link>http://en.forums.wordpress.com/topic/word-tags-a-request-for-explanation</link>
		<description>WordPress.com Forums &#187; Topic: Word tags - a request for explanation</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 04:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1-alpha-2539</generator>
				<atom:link href="http://en.forums.wordpress.com/rss/topic/word-tags-a-request-for-explanation" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>dariospace on "Word tags - a request for explanation"</title>
			<link>http://en.forums.wordpress.com/topic/word-tags-a-request-for-explanation#post-1070927</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>dariospace</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">1070927@http://en.forums.wordpress.com/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I know that these are no longer important for SEO, rather relevant for organizing data in our software or in websites' search engines.<br />
Whenever I use them in WordPress of my desktop software like Lightroom or Adobe, I wonder if there's the best, optimal option, clear, seamlessly searchable for ALL search engines dealing with complex terms.<br />
So, putting it practically, which is the winner?<br />
1. behaviour patterns<br />
2. behaviour+patterns<br />
3. behaviourpatterns<br />
4. behaviour_patterns<br />
5. behaviour-patterns
</p>
]]></description>
					</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
