As for the comments about the use of the horrible "mother fucking" phrase not really meaning what the words say it means, IMO this proves my point.We are been expected to accept such phrases as being part of everyday language. The world over we are sniggering and mouthing such nonsense as "prostitution is the world's oldest profession" while denying the truth: selling children, as well as young men and women as prostitutes is the world’s oldest form of oppression. Sexually enslaving human beings by pimping is not a righteous profession. And the vast majority of kids, young man and women in the global sex trade are not free citizens pursuing a career - they are sex slaves working for pimps who pander to men with sex addicions.
World wide we are witnessing depravity, de-valuation of humanity and misogyny on a massive scale and we are turning a blind eye to it. We are choosing to excuse and accept such "mother fucking" phrases depicting the male practices of rape and plunder following wars, as okay everyday language which can be used without shame and that, IMO is sick.
(1) Requesting a blog be marked adult/mature/not-work-safe is not out of line in any culture. I did not ever request that anyone's blog be shut down and I want to make that clear.
(2) I now comprehend Podz's point on titles and his point on sploggers working under the radar. Thanks for providing this information that I previously lacked because I now understand what I didn't before.
(3) I'm glad babbler agrees with me. I strongly believe we need a feature to mark a blog as containing content for mature audiences, and an option for all users to block out those blogs and their posts from various community lists.
(4) IMO blogs containing "images of people engaged in sexual activity" should be marked as adult/mature/not-work-safe. I accept the fact that people who create such blogs are not likely to be inclined to cut down their "readership" (or shall I say "viewers") by voluntarily having their blogs so labeled. This means that those who encounter such blog sites must bring the same to the attention of staff.
(5) If the WP management and staff do not believe that blogs that contain single or occasional posts with links to porno sites only and no "images of people engaged in sexual activity" deserve such mature/adult/not-work-safe labeling that's their call and I will accept it. But I don't feel the same way about blogs that strictly or primarily operate as "porno link farms".
(6) As WordPress staff are currently labeling some blogs that are brought to their attention as mature/adult/not-safe-for-work then why are we looking further for a definition? Obviously, there is some existing criteria, and I'm assuming it's based on "images of people engaged in sexual activity", but if not, then what is the existing critera?
(7) Living journey and I agree that it lowers the standard of WordPress when we see titles like "Porno Tube - you tube for hard" in the top ten posts. Moreover, as Podz has explained that even such a title with completely unrelated contents will "score", and as we all know that such a title will "soar" to the top, so I'm inclined to think as wank does. The simple answer is to scrap 'top blogs', 'top posts' and 'next blog' altogether.
Does anyone have a cogent case that they care to make against scrapping 'top blogs', 'top posts' and 'next blog' altogether?