WordPress.com is an easy way to start blogging. Get a blog, check out our features, read the latest announcements, choose from great themes, or learn about the team behind it.
Need help? Check out our Support site, then
Anyone else following the weirdness on Larry Sinclair and his twisted campaign to smear Barack Obama?
The sit's been garnering thousands of hits and hundreds of comments from deluded followers with every post, but now it looks like ol' Larry is taking his toys elsewhere, and not only that, wants his money back from wordpress.com - 90 bucks he claims to have paid for extra storage.
Fat chance, Larry! Oh, and good riddance.
I'm shocked by all the tags on each post.
I have saved SO. MUCH. TIME. by ignoring American politics. After all, I don't pay that much attention to French politics, and I was born there!
I was reading the post from the Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)
and in that post he was talking about how the category's weren't showing
up in the global tag system... No wonder why way to many tags...
Here is the link to the article i'm referring too
This Blog will Die at exactly 00:00 hours April 20, 2008
The guy will whine and complain about anything and everything. I thought he's shut the fup after getting arrested after a press conference a couple weeks ago, but that's just given him a wider platform to rail against all and sundry.
97 tags and 11 cats! And the post was just abov moving a blog?! What tags-obsessed lunatic!
I mean, 'about'.
Lunatic sums it up well enough. :-)
I ran into this post about 2 this morning. I thought if I got some sleep all those tags would disappear and his rantings would turn more rational.
Well, the sleep felt good anyway.
ah, lettershometoyou - this is your favourite loony, isn't it?
Please see:
sisterrosetta Says:
May 23, 2008 at 9:16 pm
Hello, zach jones
Please see following link for info regarding Larry’s polygraph. I have literally been posting this link for months now. And yet I still keep reading that Larry failed twice. Balderdash!
https://antipolygraph.org/cgi-bin/forums/YaBB.pl?num=12036%2081407
On Page 2:
“I also evaluated the second series using the computer algorithm PolyScore (v. 6.0). It evaluated the charts as No Deception Indicated, and calculated the probabilityof deception as being less than .01 on a scale from .00 to 1.00.”
“So the PolyScore algorithm (that Ed Gelb so hailed in his polygraph report for Wendy Ellis) found Sinclair truthful with a less than 1% probability of deception! But in this case, Gelb and Barland (who cannot have been unaware of the firestorm of controversy that would have resulted had they found Sinclair non-deceptive with regard to this question) somehow reached a completely opposite conclusion!”
One commenter wrote that Larry had been sandbagged. Indeed, he was.
You may also find this of interest:
Trinity people aren't speaking up either because they don't want to be the one to stop the first black president or they are scared to talk.
http://www.hillaryclintonforum.net/discussion/showthread.php?t=18616
HillBuzzBlogspotCom wrote:
June 30th, 04:15 PM
Adrienne -
I told you exactly what I have been told by people in the gay community here who have said there are definite open secrets about BHO. I've never remarked on the Sinclair stuff for one solid reason: it does not make sense with what the gay community in Chicago tells me. Not saying it couldn't be true, but that's not BHOs' M.O. here.
Being on the down-low means you only fool around with other married guys on the down-low, and there are enough successful, wealthy down-low members of Trinity, who are married, and thus have as much to lose if they rat out the other guy who is on the downlow. Some are athletes, some are other high profile men in the community, and some are not even members of the church, but elected officials themselves, in other states (that start with "M", like in Michelle) or other cities (that start with "B", like in beard).
The people I have spoken to who know Trinity well, and know open secrets well, say people aren't speaking up either because they don't want to be the one to stop the first black president or they are scared to talk....HOWEVER, they said they are positive that, after he would become President, that the open secret will no longer be a secret, and that the carefully-arranged down-low secret pacts will collapse, because the media will have an incentive to create the most sensational sex scandal to ever hit the White House: the first bisexual president.
In short --- and let's see if this clears things up --- there are people who know open-secrets who are staying quiet because outing a presidential candidate is not something they want to do, but outing a president, and exposing him as a bisexual, would be something they'd see as important, because it's a step towards having an openly gay president.
Think James McGreevey....yes, his administration collapsed when he came out, and he came out only because his affair was being telegraphed, but McGreevey still served, briefly, as an openly gay US governor. That's a step towards having other openly gay governors in the future -- ones not tainted with scandal, preferably. Outing Obama as a candidate will keep him from being elected....outing him if he becomes President means the US will have its first outed bisexual/gay president.
There is no putting that genie back in its bottle.
I don't agree with any of this Adrienne....I am just telling you what I hear on a regular basis here in Chicago.
too long. not bothered.
pagedown, pagedown, pagedown
does anybody have know a good plug in for firefox that will allow me to block political smear tabloid posts?
Ah. You want the fabled bullshitfilter. I am afraid it needs to be hard coded into your wetware.
@boblets: yeah, he's just so much fun to watch. Kind of like a bad car wreck. You should just look away, but can't.
I'm with Raincoaster on this one. Stumbled across this thread, had a quick peek at said blog, shouted WTF a few times and resolved to go back to ignoring American politics for another 10 years.
And as an American friend of the Other Half says frequently, "he appears to have issues".
stonehead - I love your comments.. (I still have pictures in my head of you stuffing pigs into penguin suits. A friend over in Ireland would happily don his dolphin suit to satisfy the tourists.)
As for US politics and loonies. It's like dog shit in France. Everywhere. And best avoided.
boblets - last time I was in Paris - about two months ago - I saw a total of one dog turd. I am not kidding. One. And we were there for a week. The city of Paris is the cleanest I've seen it in years, though can't say much for the rest of the country cuz haven't been there lately.
You're right about the loonies though. :-)
Good god! The world is coming to an end! No poo-poo in Paris... I shall have to find a better metaphor, sadly. :-( ...I thought it was rather a good one.
Yes, but a bit out-dated. Ever seen the teletubbies? Who hasn't? They have these pooper-scooper vacuums that look pretty much like the one on the tubbies.
Larry, BARACK OBAMA DENTED MY CAR!
He REFUSED to leave a note..
GET'IM!!!!
This topic has been closed to new replies.
pornstarbabylon
shoreacres
boblets
sisterrosetta
dlager
stonehead
loomisnews