@ thesacredpath – Yaaaaa, I cannot believe that of all the comments, that was the one I managed to skip over. Pretty embarrassing.
@ raincoaster – I’m not looking to pick a bone here, but the comment I left here and the one on id=15137 are not the same. The topic here is comparing sitemeter to statcounter and I was simply posting my experience with statcounter. Id=15137 clearly says “problem with statcounter” which is where, besides mentioning the blogger alternative, I ask if anyone else had underreporting issues (if you look at the time stamp, I found the other thread first). I, and I’m sure the rest of the community, do appreciate people such as yourself donating your expertise and I will do a better job of avoiding grey areas such as this in the future.
To the rest of you guys, when I say waaay underreporting (one word) I don’t mean by a mere handful. Specific example: on Sept 8th WP says I got 16 hits and SC says 5 (and that’s looking at just page loads). That’s a 3.2 fold (or 69%) difference. I don’t know how many of you are science types, but try publishing data like that and the review committee would crucify you. I believe raincoaster when he says they measure different things (I haven’t bothered to educate myself), but based on my data (not just this one example) one of these counters is no good. Based on the “search engine terms” numbers in the WP “blog stats”, I would have to say that WP’s numbers are more accurate. I’m not saying that SC should be flushed down the toilet, but perhaps its not the best choice when using WP’s free service (no javascript, assuming that is the culprit).
Am I the only one experiencing such huge differences? (note, this is the only place I’m asking this question) :)